A Large Scale Study of the Ethereum Arbitrage Ecosystem McLaughlin R, Kruegel C, Vigna G. 2023. A Large Scale Study of the Ethereum Arbitrage Ecosystem. 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). :3295--3312. Read more about A Large Scale Study of the Ethereum Arbitrage EcosystemDBLPLog in to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeX
Sherlock on Specs: Building {LTE} Conformance Tests through Automated Reasoning Chen Y, Tang D, Yao Y, Zha M, Wang XF, Liu X, Tang H, Liu B. 2023. Sherlock on Specs: Building {LTE} Conformance Tests through Automated Reasoning. 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). :3529--3545. Read more about Sherlock on Specs: Building {LTE} Conformance Tests through Automated ReasoningDBLPLog in to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeX
Did the Shark Eat the Watchdog in the {NTP} Pool? Deceiving the {NTP} {Pool’s} Monitoring System Kwon J, Song J, Hur J, Perrig A. 2023. Did the Shark Eat the Watchdog in the {NTP} Pool? Deceiving the {NTP} {Pool’s} Monitoring System 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). :6151--6166. Read more about Did the Shark Eat the Watchdog in the {NTP} Pool? Deceiving the {NTP} {Pool’s} Monitoring SystemDBLPLog in to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeX
Downfall: Exploiting Speculative Data Gathering Moghimi D. 2023. Downfall: Exploiting Speculative Data Gathering. 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). :7179--7193. Read more about Downfall: Exploiting Speculative Data GatheringDBLPLog in to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeX
Formal Analysis of {SPDM}: Security Protocol and Data Model version 1.2 Cremers C, Dax A, Naska A. 2023. Formal Analysis of {SPDM}: Security Protocol and Data Model version 1.2. 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). :6611--6628. Read more about Formal Analysis of {SPDM}: Security Protocol and Data Model version 1.2DBLPLog in to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeX
{V1SCAN}: Discovering 1-day Vulnerabilities in Reused {C/C++} Open-source Software Components Using Code Classification Techniques Woo S, Choi E, Lee H, Oh H. 2023. {V1SCAN}: Discovering 1-day Vulnerabilities in Reused {C/C++} Open-source Software Components Using Code Classification Techniques. 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). :6541--6556. Read more about {V1SCAN}: Discovering 1-day Vulnerabilities in Reused {C/C++} Open-source Software Components Using Code Classification TechniquesDBLPLog in to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeX
{BunnyHop}: Exploiting the Instruction Prefetcher Zhang Z, Tao M, O'Connell S, Chuengsatiansup C, Genkin D, Yarom Y. 2023. {BunnyHop}: Exploiting the Instruction Prefetcher. 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). :7321--7337. Read more about {BunnyHop}: Exploiting the Instruction PrefetcherDBLPLog in to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeX
{DiffSmooth}: Certifiably Robust Learning via Diffusion Models and Local Smoothing Zhang J, Chen Z, Zhang H, Xiao C, Li B. 2023. {DiffSmooth}: Certifiably Robust Learning via Diffusion Models and Local Smoothing. 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). :4787--4804. Read more about {DiffSmooth}: Certifiably Robust Learning via Diffusion Models and Local SmoothingDBLPLog in to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeX
{ACon^2}: Adaptive Conformal Consensus for Provable Blockchain Oracles Park S, Bastani O, Kim T. 2023. {ACon^2}: Adaptive Conformal Consensus for Provable Blockchain Oracles. 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). :3313--3330. Read more about {ACon^2}: Adaptive Conformal Consensus for Provable Blockchain OraclesDBLPLog in to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeX
Measuring Up to (Reasonable) Consumer Expectations: Providing an Empirical Basis for Holding {IoT} Manufacturers Legally Responsible Kustosch L, Gañán C, Schip Mvan 't, van Eeten M, Parkin S. 2023. Measuring Up to (Reasonable) Consumer Expectations: Providing an Empirical Basis for Holding {IoT} Manufacturers Legally Responsible. 32nd USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security 23). :1487--1504. Read more about Measuring Up to (Reasonable) Consumer Expectations: Providing an Empirical Basis for Holding {IoT} Manufacturers Legally ResponsibleDBLPLog in to post commentsGoogle ScholarBibTeX