Skip to main content
USENIX
  • Conferences
  • Students
Sign in
  • Home
  • Attend
    • Registration Information
    • Registration Discounts
    • Venue, Hotel, and Travel
    • Students and Grants
  • Program
    • At a Glance
    • Symposium Program
    • 2nd Workshop on Security Information Workers
    • Who Are You?! Adventures in Authentication
    • Workshop on Privacy Indicators
    • Workshop on Security Fatigue
    • Workshop on the Future of Privacy Notices and Indicators: Will Drones Deliver My Privacy Policy?
  • Activities
    • Poster Session
    • Birds-of-a-Feather Sessions
  • Sponsorship
  • Participate
    • Instructions for Authors and Speakers
    • Call for Nominations
    • Call for Papers
    • Call for Posters and Proposals
      • Call for Papers: 2nd Workshop on Security Information Workers
      • Call for Papers: Who are you?! Adventures in Authentication
      • Call for Papers: Workshop on Privacy Indicators
      • Call for Papers: Workshop on Security Fatigue
      • Workshop: Will Drones Deliver My Privacy Policy?
  • About
    • Organizers
    • Past Symposia

sponsors

Gold Sponsor
Silver Sponsor
Silver Sponsor
Bronze Sponsor
Media Sponsor
Media Sponsor
Industry Partner
  • Home
  • Attend
  • Program
  • Activities
  • Sponsorship
  • Participate
  • About

connect with us


  •  Twitter
  •  Facebook
  •  LinkedIn
  •  Google+
  •  YouTube

twitter

Tweets by @usenix

usenix conference policies

  • Event Code of Conduct
  • Conference Network Policy
  • Statement on Environmental Responsibility Policy

You are here

Home » User Attitudes Toward the Inspection of Encrypted Traffic
Tweet

connect with us

User Attitudes Toward the Inspection of Encrypted Traffic

Authors: 

Scott Ruoti and Mark O'Neill, Brigham Young University and Sandia National Laboratories"; Daniel Zappala and Kent Seamons, Brigham Young University

Abstract: 

This paper reports the results of a survey of 1,976 individuals regarding their opinions on TLS inspection, a controversial technique that can be used for both benevolent and malicious purposes. Responses indicate that participants hold nuanced opinions on security and privacy trade-offs, with most recognizing legitimate uses for the practice, but also concerned about threats from hackers or government surveillance. There is strong support for notification and consent when a system is intercepting their encrypted traffic, although this support varies depending on the situation. A significant concern about malicious uses of TLS inspection is identity theft, and many would react negatively and some would change their behavior if they discovered inspection occurring without their knowledge. We also find that a small but significant number of participants are jaded by the current state of affairs and have lost any expectation of privacy.

Scott Ruoti, Brigham Young University

Mark O'Neill, Brigham Young University

Daniel Zappala, Brigham Young University

Kent Seamons, Brigham Young University

Open Access Media

USENIX is committed to Open Access to the research presented at our events. Papers and proceedings are freely available to everyone once the event begins. Any video, audio, and/or slides that are posted after the event are also free and open to everyone. Support USENIX and our commitment to Open Access.

Ruoti PDF
View the slides

Presentation Audio

MP3 Download

Download Audio

  • Log in or    Register to post comments

Gold Sponsors

Silver Sponsors

Bronze Sponsors

Media Sponsors & Industry Partners

© USENIX

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us