Skip to main content
USENIX
  • Conferences
  • Students
Sign in
  • JETS Home
  • Editorial Board
  • FAQ
  • Volume 2, Number 3
    • Call for Papers

You are here

Home ยป Mitigating Coercion, Maximizing Confidence in Postal Elections
Tweet

connect with us

Mitigating Coercion, Maximizing Confidence in Postal Elections

Wednesday, July 23, 2014 - 4:30pm
Authors: 

Jacob Quinn Shenker and R. Michael Alvarez, California Institute of Technology

Abstract: 

Elections have traditionally depended on procedural safeguards and best practices to ensure integrity and instill trust. By making it difficult for individuals to manipulate ballots undetected, these policies electoral malfeasance. Even so, it is clearly preferable to move beyond this kind of best-effort security and instead provide strong guarantees of integrity and privacy.

An emerging literature on voting systems has identified two distinct approaches towards this end: build trust worthiness into the voting system, or audit the election after-the-fact to verify its integrity. The first strategy is embodied by end-to-end verifiable voting systems, which use cryptography to prove to the voter that their ballot was cast and tallied as intended. However, these systems are predicated on strong assumptions and use complicated, difficult-to-understand cryptography to deliver their security guarantees. Instead of attempting to provide these strict assurances, the auditing approach aims to output statistical evidence that an election was conducted properly.

Jacob Quinn Shenker, California Institute of Technology

R. Michael Alvarez, California Institute of Technology

Open Access Media

USENIX is committed to Open Access to the research presented at our events. Papers and proceedings are freely available to everyone once the event begins. Any video, audio, and/or slides that are posted after the event are also free and open to everyone. Support USENIX and our commitment to Open Access.

BibTeX
@article {185582,
author = {Jacob Quinn Shenker and R. Michael Alvarez},
title = {Mitigating Coercion, Maximizing Confidence in Postal Elections},
journal = {USENIX Journal of Election Technology and Systems (JETS)},
year = {2014},
isbn = {978-1-931971-14-0},
address = {Berkeley, California},
pages = {57--73},
url = {https://www.usenix.org/jets/issues/0203/shenker},
publisher = {USENIX Association},
number = 3,
month = aug,
}
Download
Read the Article
  • Log in or    Register to post comments

© USENIX

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us