Skip to main content
Back to USENIX
  • Conferences
  • Students
Sign in

USENIX Conference Policies

  • Event Code of Conduct
  • Conference Network Policy
  • Statement on Environmental Responsibility Policy

An Analysis of Compare-by-hash

Recent research has produced a new and perhaps dangerous technique for uniquely identifying blocks that I will call compare-by-hash. Using this technique, we decide whether two blocks are identical to each other by comparing their hash values, using a collision-resistant hash such as SHA-1[5]. If the hash values match, we assume the blocks are identical without further ado. Users of compare-by-hash argue that this assumption is warranted because the chance of a hash collision between any two randomly generated blocks is estimated to be many orders of magnitude smaller than the chance of many kinds of hardware errors. Further analysis shows that this approach is not as risk-free as it seems at first glance.

Val Henson, Sun Microsystems

BibTeX
@inproceedings {270301,
author = {Val Henson},
title = {An Analysis of Compare-by-hash},
booktitle = {9th Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems (HotOS IX)},
year = {2003},
address = {Lihue, HI},
url = {https://www.usenix.org/conference/hotos-ix/analysis-compare-hash},
publisher = {USENIX Association},
month = may
}
Download

Links

Paper: 
http://www.usenix.org/events/hotos03/tech/full_papers/henson/henson.pdf
Paper (HTML): 
http://www.usenix.org/events/hotos03/tech/full_papers/henson/henson_html/index.html
  • Log in or register to post comments

© USENIX
EIN 13-3055038

  • Privacy Policy
  • Contact Us