Check out the new USENIX Web site.
Contents Previous section Top of current sections Bottom of current sections Next section

5. Status of EDI in Denmark

We have interviewed and collected data on the use of EDI in various organizations directly involved in electronic commerce in the public and private sectors throughout the Spring of 1998. Furthermore, we have compiled data from the companies reporting data to the public sector and collected data from the VANS operators for the period 1995-1997. The data was collected between December 1997 and May 1998.

Additional data from surveys done by the Ministry of Research and Information Technology has been incorporated in this paper as well. The survey on IT in the private sector (Ministry of Research and Information Technology, 1997a) was based upon 2,001 questionnaires distributed to Danish companies. 387 were returned. Companies with 50+ employees have an over representation in the number of returned questionnaires. The survey of IT in the public sector covers the local authorities (Ministry of Research and Information Technology, 1997b) with responses from 205 of the 275 Danish municipalities and 12 of the 14 Danish counties.

5.1 Basic EDI-usage

The latest official figures from the Ministry of Research and IT are compiled in Table 2, 3, and 4. These figures give an indication of how far the strategies of the organizations have been implemented.

Table 2. EDI in Denmark, 1997: The procurement function
 
Yes
No
Planned 1997/98
Total 
(N)
Municipalities
8%
68%
24%
100% 
(205)
Counties
75%
17%
8%
100% 
(12)
Enterprises
15%
77%
7%
98%
(387)

We see that within the local government, only 8% of the municipalities used EDI, whereas 75% of the counties and 15% of the private enterprises used electronic commerce within procurement. Thus, while EDI adoption has been quite successful at the county level, substantial opportunities exist for increasing electronic transactions at the lower governmental levels.

When considering the variety of tasks in which EDI is used, approximately 50% of the counties used it to obtain information about products and services, whereas roughly 42% used it for payment. In contrast, only 5% of the municipalities used it for payment purposes. Thus counties appear to have a significant lead in utilizing electronic commerce. This is most likely attributable to the business-to-business EDI predominant in the health sector, which is primarily administrated by the counties in Denmark.

Table 3. Electronic commerce: The content of EDI (percent)
  Information on products/services Prices and discounts Delivery conditions Ordering of 
products/services
Payment for 
products/services
Municipalities
6
4
3
5
6
Counties
50
34
25
34
42
Enterprises
15
7
5
6
2

We further note that 60% of the ministries and 36% of agencies and directorates have a home page. 90% of the ministries and 53% of agencies and directorates may be contacted via an official E-mail address. 36% of the counties have a home page and 64% have an E-mail address. 16% of the municipalities have a home page and 30% have an E-mail address (Ministry of Research and Information Technology, 1997).

=TOP HALIGN="CENTER">
49
Table 4. Informatization in the Danish Public Sector (percent)
Level of government/ year No use of electronic records, management or mail systems Electronic mail used for internal or external use Electronic recording or electronic case administration systems introduced Electronic handling of incoming mail and electronic case administration
Central 1993
31
49
20
0
1995a
15
20
0
1995a
15
34
49
2
1996a
4
14
46
35
Local 1995b
11
45
38
6
1996c
2
19
28
51
Counties 1995b
7
36
57
0
1996c
0
21
14
64
Note. a= spring, b= primo, c= ultimo

Accessing the overall organizational transformation via IT, most of the applications are localized or integrated internally. However, there has been a high degree of informatization during the period 1993-1996. In 1993, for example, 31% of the central government units had no use of electronic records, management systems or mail systems, while in 1996, only 4 percent have no use of these applications. Similarly, in 1995, 6% of the municipalities used electronic incoming mail and electronic case administraion, while in 1996, 51% of the municipalities used these applications.

5.2 VANS and EDIFACT

Our survey (Andersen and others, 1998b) shows a continuous increase in number of EDI-messages transferred through VANS-operators and a sharp increase in number of companies capable of sending and receiving EDIFACT.

Table 5. EDIFACT traffic by VANS in number of bytes and messages, 1995-1997.
Year
Bytes
Messages
Number
 
Growth per year
Number
 
Growth per year
1997 57.110.724 }
}
  26.593.813 }
}
 
   
33%
 
45%
1996 43.007.936   18.401.306  
   
33%
 
46%
1995 32.375.495   12.630.458  

As shown in Table 5, more EDIFACT messages have been sent via VANS measured both in terms of number and size. From 1995-1997 the EDIFACT application has increased on average by approx. 45% annually in terms of number of messages and by approx. 33% in terms of size of messages. If we compare the number of bytes via VANS in EDIFACT-format in December 1997 with the number in January 1995, the increase amounts to approx. 82% over the three years. Measured in terms of messages, the study shows that 176% more messages were sent in December 1997 compared with January 1995 (Figure 2).

Figure 2. EDIFACT via VANS 1995-1997, in number of messages per month

Figure 2. EDIFACT via VANS 1995-1997, in number of messages per month

Table 6 shows the sharp increase in the number of companies capable of sending and receiving EDIFACT messages. The analysis of the number of users of the EDIFACT standard in Denmark shows a particular increase in the number of small companies among the new users of EDIFACT. From 1995 to 1996 the total number of companies that could send/receive EDIFACT messages increased by 26 percent compared to 31 percent from 1996 to 1997. Among the small companies the increase amounted to 90 percent from 1996 to 1997.

Table 6. Allocated EAN B- og C-location numbers to enterprises, 1990-1997
Year
Number of newly allocated numbers
Accumulated amount of B and C numbers
B-number
C-number
Total
Index (1990=100)
1990
0
16
16
100
1991
2
45
63
39R>
1991
2
45
63
394
1992
25
66
154
963
1993
55
53
262
1.638
1994
59
50
371
2.319
1995
45
45
461
2.881
1996
77
42
580
3.625
1997
146
34
760
4.750
Total
409
351
n.a.
n.a.
Note. B-numbers are EAN-location numbers sold without the associated manual. C-numbers are EAN-location numbers including manual.

5.3 Internet Based EDI

Rather than using VANS operators, one might use the Internet for EDI. Approximately 50% of Danish enterprises with more than 5 employees have access to the Internet. Almost 80% of the enterprises communicate electronically from the enterprise via call connections or leased lines (Ministry of Research and Information Technology, 1997).

At present, it is very limited how much companies apply browser-EDI for business-to-business trade. Only five per cent of the companies have used the Internet for electronic commerce, whereas approx. 35% of the companies use EDI via VANS or proprietary (closed) circuits. As yet, the companies are not convinced that delivery is ensured, nor secured, on the Internet.

It is predicted that browser-EDI, which can be called a relatively inexpensive integration of the extreme ends of the value chains, will continue to make headway. The end of the communication where the EDI, possibly the EDIFACT message, is integrated into the company’s other business processes will benefit substantially from this. Therefore, the solution must be seen as a first step towards full integration in the "browser end" in order that data also can be interchanged electronically with the other business processes in this end.

The companies will increasingly apply browser-EDI so they themselves can offer "VANS-services" and services/sales via Web pages on the Internet. According to our estimates this will not reduce the number of companies that apply EAN-numbers or the number and the size of EDIFACT-transmissions.

5.4 Distribution of EDI Types by Sectors

Based on the interviews in industry associations and various other available data we have made a quantitative estimate of the status of the EDI application as shown in Table 7 and Table 8. In the headings of the tables the electronic interchange of data has been divided into three format types: proprietary EDI, EDIFACT and browser-EDI. The column to the extreme right shows the growth potential for electronic communication, which is defined as the remaining quantity of documents that have not yet been converted to EDI. The sum of the four columns equals 100%.

The tables’ extreme left column shows industry areas. The cells of the tables show our estimate of the present coverage in percentages at the beginning of 1998 for the three categories in addition to our estimate of the annual increase in the period 1998-2000. In the insurance area less than 10% of communication is made by means of proprietary standards, more than 50% of communication takes place via EDIFACT, while there is less than 1% application of browser-EDI internally in the industry. In the next 2 - 3 years the industry expects EDIFACT- application to increase by 10-20% and browser-EDI application by 20-30%.

(5-10% growth)
Table 7. Dissemination of EDI in the financial sector, production and commerce, and the transport sector
Sector
EDI type
Potential
(not realized)
Proprietary EDI
EDIFACT
Browser-EDI
Insurrance
<10% coverage
>50% coverage
(10-20% growth)
< 1% coverage
(20-30% growth)
30-40%
Banks
70-80% coverage
<2% coverage
(10-20% growth)
<0,1% coverage
(5-10% growth)
20-30%
Mortgage credit
20-30%
Mortgage credit
70-80% coverage
EDIFACT-based Intranet from 1999
< 1% coverage
20-30%
Industry
n. a.
15% coverage
(15% growth)
< 1% coverage
80-85%
Wholesale
n. a.
<5% coverage
(10-50% growth)
< 1% coverage
>95%
Crafts and small industries (SMEs)
n. a.
<5% coverage
(10-50% growth)
< 1% coverage
>95%
Construction
n. a.
<5% coverage
(10-50% growth)
< 1% coverage
>95%
Retail commerce
n. a.
20-30% coverage
(20-0% growth)
< 1% coverage
70-80%
Agriculture
30% coverage
30% coverage
(10-20% growth)
< 10% coverage
30-40%
Heavy freight
>30% coverage
>30% coverage
>10% coverage
(20-30% growth)
30%
Postal services
>20% coverage
20-30% coverage*
<10% coverage
(20-30% growth)
40%
Shipping
>30% coverage
>30% coverage
>15% coverage
(20-30% growth)
20-30%
Notes:

The growth in brackets denotes the expected annual growth in messages measured in percentage of the previous year for the period 1998 - ultimo 2000.
n. a. means "not available".
* domestic messages; but >90% coverage of non-domestic messages.

Table 8. Dissemination of EDI in the public sector
Authorities
EDI type
Potential
(not realized)
Proprietary EDI
EDIFACT
Browser-EDI
Central level <10% coverage
10-20% coverage
10-20% coverage
(10-40% growth)
<50%
Local levels (counties, municipalities)
<10% coverage
<20% coverage
<10% coverage
(10-40% growth)
<20% coverage
<10% coverage
(10-40% growth)
<60%
Public Health
<10% coverage
20-30% coverage
<1% coverage
(5-10% growth)
50-60%

5.5 EDI Usage by Type

It has not been possible to compile enough data to give a precise summary of the current distribution of EDI usage among our three EDI classes. A prediction of the future distribution is, of course, even harder to make. Based on our current information, a yearly growth in number of transactions between 30% and 50% is not unlikely.

Figure 3. EDI-usage by proprietary standards, EDIFACT, and Browser-EDI in 1998 and 2000

Compared to the total amount of EDI-usage, Browser-EDI is especially likely to raise its share (from 10% to 25%), while the EDIFACT-based EDI is only expected to raise from 50% to 55% in the 1998-2000 period. Consequently the share of proprietary standards is expected to deminish from 40% to 20%. Figure 3 summarizes the distribution of EDI usage among our 3 EDI types by early 1998 and by the end of year 2000.

Contents Previous section Top of current sections Bottom of current sections Next section
@ Juul, Andersen & Bjørn-Andersen: Electronic Commerce in Denmark, Proceedings of the 3rd USENIX Workshop on Electronic Commerce, Boston, September 1998. LIGN=right>n. a.