Check out the new USENIX Web site. next up previous
Next: Mechanisms for content-based request Up: Background Previous: Locality-aware request distribution

   
The problem with HTTP/1.1

HTTP/1.1 persistent connections pose a problem for clusters that employ content-based request distribution, including LARD. The problem is that existing, scalable mechanisms for content-based distribution operate at the granularity of TCP connections. With HTTP/1.1, multiple HTTP requests may arrive on a single TCP connection. Therefore, a mechanism that distributes load at the granularity of a TCP connection constrains the feasible distribution policies, because all requests arriving on a given connection must be served by a single back-end node.

This constraint is most serious in clusters where certain requests can only be served by a subset of the back-end nodes. Here, the problem is one of correctness, since a back-end node may receive requests that it cannot serve.

In clusters where each node is capable of serving any valid request, but the LARD policy is used to partition the working set, performance loss may result since a back-end node may receive requests not in its current share of the working set. As we will show in Section 6, this performance loss can more than offset the performance advantages of using persistent connections in cluster servers.


next up previous
Next: Mechanisms for content-based request Up: Background Previous: Locality-aware request distribution
Peter Druschel
1999-04-27