Please read these guidelines carefully. They were written to help you provide
your submission with its best possible chance to be accepted. As you know, the
Program Committee can't accept every paper submitted to the conference, and this
document was put together to help improve your odds of getting your paper
For the first JVM Symposium, we are looking for a wide range of papers from both academia and industry. Since this is still a new area, we are looking at all topics related to Java Virtual Machines, from JavaCard implementations to VM implementations for servers. Papers should describe contributions to the field and be useful to researchers and practitioners alike.
CONFERENCE DATES:The first Java Virtual Machine Research and Technology Symposium will be held April 23-24, 2001 in Monterey, California, USA.
Dates for paper submissions:
THE CALL FOR PAPERS:For your convenience, here is a summary of the important information in the Call For Papers:
TO GET A COPY OF THE CALL FOR PAPERS:
A complete copy of the Call for Papers for this conference is available on the Web.
WHAT KINDS OF PAPERS DOES USENIX PUBLISH?
The most important thought to keep in mind when deciding whether to submit a paper is "What will the audience or readers learn from my paper?" We don't expect every paper to report on a major breakthrough, but we do look for something new, potentially useful, and not entirely obvious. Think about how different your work is from previously published papers; it may be good work but if there is nothing new to learn, it isn't worth reading (or writing) a paper about it. Think about how other people might find your work useful; can they apply what you are teaching them to their own systems? And, does your work really improve upon the previous state of the art? Or does it show how other people have been confused? "Negative results" that contradict the conventional wisdom are often as important as positive results.
Trying to decide if something is non-obvious isn't easy (patent lawyers make lots of money arguing about this), and sometimes the best ideas seem obvious in hindsight. However, if several people have done the same thing, and you are simply the first person to have considered writing a paper about it, perhaps it is too obvious.
The Program Committee will also be trying to decide if papers will lead to a good 25-minute presentation. Some papers are just too complex to be presented this way (perhaps you should focus on just one aspect); other papers just don't have enough to talk about for that long. On the other hand, a few rare papers are accepted mostly because the committee expects them to produce an interesting talk, but that might not otherwise merit publication.
Again, when you are writing your paper, keep in mind "what do I intend to teach the reader?" That means keeping the paper focused on one or a few main points. Don't try to cram too many big issues into the paper, and don't fill it up with irrelevant details. But do include enough background for the reader to understand why your problem is important, how your work relates to previous work in the field, and how it might fit into a practical system. Also, provide enough detail for the reader to put your performance measurements in context. It is vitally important to provide a good bibliography, both so that you give proper credit to previous work, and so that a reader can know where to turn to find additional background information. The Program Committee will not look kindly on a paper if the author doesn't appear to be familiar with the current literature.
MORE INFORMATION IS AVAILABLE
Lots of papers and books have been written about how to write a good paper. We'd like to suggest that you read a paper called An Evaluation of the Ninth SOSP Submissions; or, How (and How Not) to Write a Good Systems Paper. This was written by Roy Levin and David D. Redell, the program committee co-chairs for SOSP-9, and first appeared in ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, Vol. 17, No. 3 (July, 1983), pages 35-40.
Although SOSP and JVM have different foci, Levin and Redell give good advice for authors of any kind of systems paper. The authors have graciously agreed to make this paper available online.
If you have any other questions, feel free to send mail to the Program Chair at email@example.com.
HOW SHOULD I GET MY MANUSCRIPT TO YOU?The Program Committee would prefer to receive submissions via this Web form (Submissions are closed). While we understand that there are people who may not yet have access to the Web, using the Web for a majority of submissions will not only help in automating the truly tedious administrative work in paper submission, but it will also help in avoiding paper printing and submission costs all around. If you cannot submit your paper via the Web for any reason whatsoever, please contact the Program Chair (firstname.lastname@example.org) for alternative means of submission.
We have found in the past that PDF files (readable by Acroread or Acrobat) are often the best means of submitting papers.
PostScript files are also acceptable, but given that PostScript generators vary quite a lot, it is likely that we may not be able to print every submitted PostScript file. For instance, several software packages generate PostScript that can only be printed on Apple Laserwriters. So if you submit PostScript documents, please remember the following:
If the paper you submit via the web form is missing figures, tables or other illustrations that are present in your original paper, please indicate this with a prominent note and contact the Program Chairs for submitting these illustrations.
Overseas authors should make sure that their abstract prints properly on US-style 8.5x11 inch paper. Please make sure that you leave enough room for top and bottom margins.
Finally, if you have any other questions, at any time during the entire submissions process, especially if you have a paper idea but have concerns about it not being "right" for this conference, PLEASE send mail to the Program Chair at email@example.com.