Check out the new USENIX Web site. next up previous
Next: Bibliography Up: Evaluating Block-level Optimization through Previous: Related Work


Conclusions

In this paper, we presented a measurement-based analysis of the optimization effectiveness in the IO subsystem, focusing on the file system, device driver scheduler, and the disk itself. We used the Postmark benchmark to generate heavy IO write-intensive workload and the Linux kernel compilation to generate medium IO write-intensive workload. We analyzed four file systems, four device driver level disk schedulers and three Seagate disk drives.

Our measurements showed that request merging is critical for reducing the number of disk requests and enhancing overall performance. Although, request merging takes place at the device driver scheduler, it is the block allocation and data management at the file system itself that determines the effectiveness of the request merging process. The most effective file system in our measurements was ReiserFS which improved by as high as 100% application-level throughput.

Under medium load though, request merging becomes less efficient and request reordering becomes the tool to optimize the IO traffic. Request reordering at the device driver level improved application-level throughput by as much as 20% application-level throughput under the Deadline device driver scheduler.

Disk drives have become very effective on optimizing request reordering, closing any performance gaps between the elevator-based and FCFS device driver schedulers. Increasing the queue depth at the disk drive under the write-through cache policy, improves the overall application throughput with as much as 30% if the device driver scheduler is seek-based and more than 6 times if the device driver scheduler is FCFS (No-Op). On the contrary, under heavy load, disk queuing has a negative impact on application throughput when the write-back cache policy is enabled. Overall, combining the write-through disk cache policy and high queue depths performs similarly with the write-back disk cache policy and it is attractive because it does not compromise data reliability and consistency, as the write-back cache policy does.


next up previous
Next: Bibliography Up: Evaluating Block-level Optimization through Previous: Related Work
Alma Riska 2007-04-24