HotOS X, Tenth Workshop on Hot Topics in Operating Systems Abstract
Red Team Paper
Aaron B. Brown, Anupam Chanda, Rik Farrow, Alexandra Fedorova, Petros Maniatis, and Michael L. Scott
The Many Faces of Systems Researchand How to Evaluate Them
Improper evaluation of systems papers may result in the loss or delay in publication of possibly important research. This paper posits that systems research papers may be evaluated in one or more of the three dimensions of science, engineering and art. Examples of these dimensions are provided, and methods for evaluating papers based on these dimensions are suggested. In the dimension of science, papers can be judged by how well they actually follow the scientific method, and by the inclusion of proofs or statistical measures of the significance of results. In engineering, the applicability and utility of the research in solving real world problems is the main metric. Finally, we argue that art be considered as a paper category evaluated based on elegance, simplicity, and beauty.
- View the full text of this paper in HTML and PDF.
Until June 2006, you will need your USENIX membership identification in order to access the full papers. The Proceedings are published as a collective work, © 2005 by the USENIX Association. All Rights Reserved. Rights to individual papers remain with the author or the author's employer. Permission is granted for the noncommercial reproduction of the complete work for educational or research purposes. USENIX acknowledges all trademarks within this paper.
- If you need the latest Adobe Acrobat Reader, you can download it from Adobe's site.